STATE PERFORMANCE BEFORE INDIGENOUS “CRIMES”:
A brief exposition on Brazilian jurisprudence
Abstract
In view of the international and constitutional protection of native peoples, a legal analysis of millenary cultural practices in indigenous communities is essential in view of the internal understanding of the illicit and the framing of the act in the light of the cultural defense theory, under penalty of State to act in disagreement with the constitutional and international protections and guarantees granted to indigenous peoples, which justifies the choice of theme. The construction of this study takes place through the hypothetical-deductive and hypothetical-comparative methods, the latter will take place through the exposition of some judgments. One of the objectives achieved was the demonstration that native cultural practices can be considered as a culturally motivated crime through the application of supralegal causes of exclusion of illegality embodied in the multiculturalist cultural defense theory. This is because it was understood that the framing of such an act as a prohibition error no longer serves the current dilemma, given that it is a segregating and prejudiced view, still adhering to the egalitarian assimilationist model. But, the practical exposition of such theoretical guidelines will be sought in the performance of the State in the face of concrete cases, in order to achieve an adequate provision of justice to minority groups in Brazil, serving this project as a beacon to illuminate the obscurities that involve indigenous peoples and which, for the time being, remain veiled by state political interests.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito Contemporâneo UNIDEP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.